fren

Garmin Forerunner 970 Review: The Most Complete Triathlon Watch Right Now?

3 min read
Garmin Forerunner 970 Review: The Most Complete Triathlon Watch Right Now?
🤖 AI-generated summary
Garmin is back in force with the new Forerunner 970. Garmin has rethought quite a few elements, particularly on the sensor and interface side: Built-in mic and speaker: useful for voice feedback, or even listening to a podcast without headphones (yes, it can come in handy). Even with Garmin's good optimization, the 970 lasts less than MIP models: In always-on mode, battery drains fast.

Garmin is back in force with the new Forerunner 970. Out with MIP screens, in with AMOLED, next-generation health sensors, and a whole load of features for demanding athletes. But is it a simple evolution or a real revolution? Spoiler: a bit of both.

🆕 What Actually Changed

The Forerunner 970 is a 965++, but not just on the surface. Garmin has rethought quite a few elements, particularly on the sensor and interface side:

  • Built-in mic and speaker: useful for voice feedback, or even listening to a podcast without headphones (yes, it can come in handy).
  • Elevate Gen 5 sensor: ECG, overnight body temperature, respiratory tracking… Garmin puts health front and center, and it’s not just a gimmick.
  • Bright AMOLED display: goodbye mediocre readability, hello colors that pop. Even in sunlight, it looks great.
  • Sapphire glass and titanium: durability + premium look. This is closer to a Fenix than a regular Forerunner.
  • Built-in LED flashlight: already seen on Fenix/Epix, but always handy (early morning runs or late-night returns…).
  • New health/performance widgets: “Running Economy” and “Running Tolerance” to train smarter and avoid injuries.
  • Built-in triathlon training plan: this is the first time Garmin has offered this natively on a Forerunner.

🔋 Battery Life: Not (Yet) Its Strong Point

Let’s be clear — AMOLED looks great, but it drains power. Even with Garmin’s good optimization, the 970 lasts less than MIP models:

  • In always-on mode, battery drains fast.
  • To hit Garmin’s promised runtime, you’ll need to lower the brightness… but then you lose readability.
  • In my experience, the watch was showing 5 days once fully charged. Far from the 8 days Garmin advertises!
  • If you compare the 970’s price to a Fenix 8, I tend to favor the Fenix 8’s battery life.
  • Not a disaster, but worth considering depending on your sport (long trail, ultra? Look elsewhere).

🎯 Who Is This Watch For?

👉 Ideal if:

  • You do triathlon, or multisport with detailed health tracking.
  • You’re coming from a Forerunner 945 or older.
  • The ECG, flashlight, and AMOLED display appeal to you.

🚫 Not essential if:

  • You have a recent Forerunner 965.
  • You don’t use health widgets or the voice assistant.
  • Battery life matters more to you than aesthetics or features.

💭 My Take

Garmin is moving its Forerunner lineup toward something more premium. You can feel it in the materials, the health features, the overall approach. The 970 isn’t a technical revolution, but it’s a deliberate step up-market.

Given the asking price of €750, you can seriously consider the Fenix 8, available for around a hundred euros more. It offers superior battery life and an even more premium finish, making it a very compelling alternative for those who prioritize ruggedness and endurance above all else.

Got a reaction to this article?

Feel free to reach out if you'd like to react to this article.

Me soutenir